Carbon dating skeptic
Carbon dating skeptic - sask dating site
(They conveniently forget to mention that the tree ring chronology was arranged by C14 dating.The scientists who were trying to build the chronology found the tree rings so ambiguous that they could not decide which rings matched which (using the bristlecone pine).
(2.) I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ.
Libby, the discoverer of the C14 dating method, was very disappointed with this problem.
He understood that archaeological artifacts were readily available.
In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.
This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.
Example: wood found in a grave of known age by historically reliable documents is the standard for that time for the C14 content.
This standard content of C14 can then be used for wood not associated with a historically documented date.during the industrial revolution more carbon-12 was being produced offsetting the ratio a bit).Carbon dating is somewhat accurate because we are able to determine what the ratio was in the unobservable past to a certain extent.One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.So they tested some of the ring sequences by C14 to put the sequences in the 'right' order.