Prevalence dating violence victimization
Prevalence dating violence victimization - neelam kothari dating
(Count such things as being hit, slammed into something, or injured with an object or weapon).” Response options included the following: I did not date or go out with anyone during the past 12 months, 0 times, 1 time, 2 or 3 times, 4 or 5 times, or 6 or more times.Sexual DV was assessed with the following question: “During the past 12 months, how many times did someone you were dating or going out with force you to do sexual things that you did not want to do?
In the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a household survey, it is estimated that nearly 6% of 12- to 17-year-olds misused prescription psychotherapeutic drugs in the past year, whereas in the school-based Monitoring the Future survey, it is reported that a higher annual prevalence of 12.0% among 12th-graders misused prescription psychotherapeutic drugs during the same time period.
In another study in which researchers used self-reported data collected from high school students in Maryland, students who had experienced physical or psychological DVV were more likely than students who had not experienced such victimization to be classified as polysubstance users (users of multiple types of substances) or as users of just alcohol and marijuana than to be classified as nonsubstance users.
It is likely that the association between substance use and DVV operates in both directions because researchers have suggested that substance use may increase the risk for violence victimization and that those who have experienced violence victimization may be more likely to engage in substance use behaviors, perhaps as an unhealthy coping mechanism.
Researchers of another study who used data collected from ED patients in Michigan and focused on youth aged 14 to 24 years who screened positive for substance use, reported that prescription sedative and opioid misuse were more likely to be reported before DV than alcohol use or alcohol and marijuana use.
It should be noted that DV as assessed in both of these studies combined DV aggression and victimization into a single DV measure, and there was no exploration of different types of DV (eg, sexual or physical).
Researchers of another study of Michigan ED patients aged 14 to 20 years reported that NMUPD was not associated with DV aggression or DVV.
In other studies, researchers have looked at the issue of NMUPD and violence victimization among adolescent populations but they have not focused specifically on the dating context.
The sample was restricted to students who dated during the 12 months before the survey, resulting in a sample of 5136 boys and 5307 girls.
Sex-stratified logistic regression models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (a PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between lifetime NMUPD and DVV.
Studies of emergency department settings and small geographic areas suggest an association may exist, although how that association may vary by sex is not clear.
In this study, we provide sex-stratified, nationally representative data on the association between NMUPD and dating violence victimization among US high school students.
By using the 4-level measure of DVV, after adjusting for covariates, sexual DVV only (a PR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.21–2.12) and both physical and sexual DVV (a PR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.26–2.17) were positively associated with NUMPD among boys, whereas among girls, physical DVV only (a PR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.16–1.75) and both physical and sexual DVV (a PR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03–1.99) were positively associated with NMUPD.