Personal sex chats
Personal sex chats
Others may be worried about confidential information, or be working in countries with a record of human rights abuses.It is not the Home Secretary’s place to tell the public that they do not need end-to-end encryption.
Technology companies say that such a system is impossible.
"Who uses Whats App because it is end-to-end encrypted, rather than because it is an incredibly user-friendly and cheap way of staying in touch with friends and family?
" It isn't clear what Ms Rudd was referring to when she suggested there was a trade-off between ease of use and features, and security.
End-to-end encryption works by ensuring that only the sender and recipient of a message can read it – meaning it would not be possible for tech firms to give government access to specific messages, even if they wanted to.
Ms Rudd took on that argument and said that might be true "in theory" but that "the reality is very different".
Almost every major chat platform – including Apple's i Message – uses encryption in a way that is automatic and doesn't require anything particular of its users.
Some chat providers like Google choose not to enable end-to-end encryption by default because it means it cannot scan chats and allow its AI to read them.
You have to be really clear on that and set your boundaries accordingly. That only means you won’t be meeting the men you are incompatible with and that’s not really a loss.
If he respects them, then he gets the green light and you two can continue to get to know him. Yes, you might get some radio silence at first but eventually, someone will emerge from that rubble and will be similar to you with values more aligned to yours.
"Amber Rudd must be absolutely clear on what co-operation she expects from Internet companies.
She is causing immense confusion because at the moment she sounds like she is asking for the impossible.
"Real people often prefer ease of use and a multitude of features to perfect, unbreakable security.